Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660: Performance

processor chip

Qualcomm has made many mid-range processors since the popularization of the smartphone. In the last couple years, Snapdragon has been noted as the dominant processor in mobile industry, with the Snapdragon 660 becoming a big player in the 600 series.

Samsung has its Exynos chipsets which is a competitor to the Snapdragon. Exynos 7904 is one of the newest processors in the market. And this article will compare Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660: Specifications

We want to see how they compare:

Property

Exynos 7904

Snapdragon 660

Manufacturing Process

14nm

14nm

Architecture

64-bit

64-bit

CPU

2 x ARM Cortex-A73, 6 x ARM Cortex-A53

8x Kryo 260 cores

GPU

Mali-G71 MP2

Adreno 512 with Vulkan API

RAM

LPDDR4X, eMMC 5.1

LPDDR4x

Bluetooth Support

Bluetooth 4.2

Bluetooth 5.0

Camera

Single camera up to 32MP, dual camera of 16MP+16MP or triple camera setup

Single camera up to 24MP or dual camera of 16MP+16MP

Charging

Adaptive Fast Charging

Qualcomm Quick Charge 4.0

Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660: Performance

Both chipsets are made with Samsung’s 14nm LPP FinFET process node. Several manufacturers now opt for smaller process modes for their big phones including the Apple A12 Bionic (7nm) and Exynos 9820 (10nm). In this way, 14nm node isn’t particularly new and focuses on more affordable devices.

In terms of CPU configuration, Snapdragon 660 has eight kryo cores divided into two units of efficiency and performance.

samsung exynos 7904 vs qualcomm snapdragon 660

Qualcomm chipsets come with eight Kryo 360 cores based on ARM Cortex A75 CPUs. Qualcomm promises improved task sharing capacities among its cores. In terms of the GPU, Snapdragon 660 houses the mid-range Adreno 512 GPU. It renders pure graphics efficiently with API support such as Vulkan 1.0 and OpenGL ES.

samsung exynos 7904 vs qualcomm snapdragon 660

On the other hand, the Exynos 7904 uses the Cortex platform architecture and a 2+6 core configuration. This implies that the chipset has two 1.8GHz and six 1.6GHz. The Exynos 7904 supports Vulak 1.0 API.

Below is a quick face-off between both chipsets on different devices:

Property

Xiaomi Mi A2 (4GB)

Samsung Galaxy M20 (4GB)

Antutu Total Score

137147

108290

Antutu CPU Score

60558

47076

Antutu GPU Score

30830

21088

Geekbench (Single-core)

1652

1319

Geekbench (Multi-core)

5121

4119

3DMark (Sling Shot Extreme – OpenGL)

1341

580

3DMark (Sling Shot Extreme – Vulkan)

1276

1097

Samsung exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm snapdragon 660: Camera

Exynos 7904 supports up to 32 single lens setup or a dual 16MP lens. It can even take up a triple camera setup.

The Snapdragon 660 supports single lenses up to 25 megapixel and dual camera setup up to 16MP. Also, the chipset captures very clear images, less noise, and faster autofocus with accurate colour production.

Charging Technique

Snapdragon 660 features Quick Charge 4.0 which promises faster charge time and better battery efficiency. This technique can get you five hours or more when charged in five minutes.

Samsung didn’t tell us how much efficient Exynos has become, but agrees it’s faster too.

Artificial Intelligence

As a respectable processor, Snapdragon 660 has some unique features of which AI is one. The processor supports Qualcomm Neural Processing Engine SDK. It works with other AI frameworks like Google’s TensorFlow and Caffe/Caffe2.

Unfortunately, Samsung hasn’t divulged information regarding AI integration with the Exynos 7904.

Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660: Verdict

Both processors may be mid-range chipsets, but the Snapdragon 660 is the better of the two when it comes to performance. We are yet to have some information regarding the Exynos processor. Until Samsung give us those details, we will go with the Snapdragon 660.

Related:

Posted by Timmylehyn Okungbowa

Business and tech writer, he is bent toward breaking the most complex concepts into easy and comprehensible words.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *